Posted on 06/17/2015 6:33:51 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
BALTIMORE (WJZ) — A war of words plays out between Baltimore’s mayor and the union that represents city police. The union wants to know–did Stephanie Rawlings-Blake order police to stand down during violent riots that injured more than 100 officers.
Christie Ileto with the tense exchange.
Keeping the peace in Baltimore has been a struggle since April 27–both on the streets and now among city leaders–where a very public dispute is brewing between police brass, the union and the mayor.
No one was prepared when tensions boiling exploded at Mondawmin Mall before sweeping the city.
“They should have had all of the officers with the proper equipment on,” one officer said.
Two active city cops tell CNN they were ill-equipped and told to not engage. The police union wants explanations, tweeting Tuesday night a letter, saying it’s moving forward with an “after action report.”
Read the full letter from FOP
“The release will resolve questions about what was ordered, in fact, what was not ordered,” said FOP President Lt. Gene Ryan.
At the heart of the discord is was there an order for police to stand down. The mayor responding in a Twitter frenzy, saying the truth will come out before calling the police union letter full of allegations that are not helping heal the city.
“I never gave an order to stand down,” said Baltimore Police Commissioner Anthony Batts.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
Even Commissioner Batts denies giving such an order.
Councilman Carl Stokes says it’s not the most pressing issue, like the surging crime and the 135 homicides this year.
Ileto: “How does this war of words that’s playing out in the public distract from the bigger issue?”
Stokes: “The back and forth that’s going on and the tweets between the mayor and the police department and the FOP and people are saying why are they fighting one another instead of fighting the criminals that are making our life really bad these days?”
Police have made reforms to training and purchased new equipment after 160 officers were injured during the riots.
The bigger issue includes the effect that the argument between mayor and police is having.
in other words - the bigger picture is how an out-of-control populace (with largely known demographics) has fomented unrest while currying favor with the (same demographic) political team that has prevented the (mixed demographic) police department from getting the (known demographic) populace under control again.
Hmmm, I wonder if Ileto belongs to a certain known demographic...
It's obvious the city needs more federal dollars.
Does the word “criminals” include Mosby, Rawlings-whatever, Cummings, the other Mosby, Batts, et al?
Because it should.
Seeing welfare from the eyes of the person who wants to help - - it's noble. The best of Christian values. But a closer look shows the destructive effect that 'caring' can do to destroy families. Replacing fathers with the State had unintentional consequences.
Looking at policing through the eyes of a policeman - a person willing to give his life to protect the innocent is amazing.. and again - noble. The essence of Christian 'good'. But the fruit of that 'goodness' is not good in the black community. Same as welfare - and the effects it had on the black family and the community - is bad. With all the good intentions in the world 'help' has made the black community an unacceptable nightmare. Dangerous for innocent black people trapped in those neighborhoods - and for people of other races near them - it's horrible. My point - which I'm really and truly trying to get to - is that incentives have to be analyzed and changed. What's happening isn't working.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.