[Prolixus]

The suit claims that Clendennen’s 4th and 14th Amendment rights were violated by Waco’s alleged policy decision to indict and hold people with “fill in the name” criminal complaints and seize their property.

You are not up-to-speed with the facts in this case and again, did you not take an oath pledging to defend the U.S. Constitution?

[thefactor]

I've taken a few oaths, and I have fulfilled them all. Call me crazy, but I'm inclined to give the police the benefit of the doubt, for now.

And if I had a nickel for every baseless, frivolous lawsuit filed by arrested persons, I'd be rich. Do I think this guy committed a crime that day? No. Do I think there was PC to arrest at the time? Yup.

[dragnet2]

Think about this.

The cops were basically laying in wait, watching and observing.

That makes the cops witnesses.

Since these cops were witnesses and in fact opened fire on several individuals, do they not have a damn good idea who the few individuals were allegedly fighting? They shot at them right?

It begs the question, if they had a damn good idea who caused the trouble why take all 170 people into custody and then charge them ALL with felonies?

This is total bull sh*t.