Really?
From the article:
The company policy states that they are a “family friendly” firm and won’t play vulgar music, tolerate provocative dancing or be involved with strippers, “fortune tellers, psychics, or magicians.”
“We will always try to provide a bright, entertaining, wholesome and fun deejay style where no one is left out,” the site says. “Let us work together to keep America clean and good!”
(snip)
Lampiris sounded unconcerned about a possible legal challenge. Their firm, which has at times had a roster of 40 DJ-contractors, has turned down other events, he said, such as when a teacher wouldn’t promise to work to stop raunchy dancing among students, or when he found out a bridal party included several lesbians.
If he provided DJs for events with all manner of heterosexual debauchery and refused to provide services to a sodomite event, you'd have a point. But it appears that he refuses to provide DJs for any event that has non-Christian activity. Does that still qualify as bigotry (he's a bigot against who, exactly?)
He us a bigot and so is anyone who assumes from the information given that a birthday party hosted by homosexual men for a friend will feature debauchery. Isn’t that an overreach here?
How selective is his "non-Christian activity"? For example, will they work a birthday party or wedding or any other event for a couple where one or the other has been married before? By doing so isn't he condoning adultery?