[P-Marlowe]

Ok, what you’re doing is trying to shoehorn fit trade matters into issues of treaties and that is the wrong approach because trade matters are not treated as treaties in the USA.

The are considered "treaties" by the countries that sign them and by international courts and under international law.

I suppose you could call them a banana.

[Hostage]

Well now you’re starting to act like a smart ass which is stupid.

In order to get ‘your version’ of definitions accepted you will need to have courts overturn hundreds of years of precedents - NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

I tried to contribute to your thread objective referenced material but I can see and others reading can see that your aim is to force your view on everyone and everything. I also gave you what I consider wise counsel on how to modify your approach but you do not listen and instead you respond with smart ass remarks.

I’m done here.