Replies

Apparently, Rachel had been assisting a victim who had accused her biological (i.e. white) older brother of child molestation in Colorado, and previously suggested the timing of her Montana-based parents’ media interviews about her performative racial identity was connected to the case.

1. That is an alleged victim. Her brother has been charged but not convicted.

2. It is entirely appropriate for the sister to testify if she has relevant evidence of molestation of a child by her brother. It is also appropriate for her to privately cheer for justice if for whatever reason she believes her brother to be guilty.

3. Assisting someone in accusations against a family member, without any direct knowledge of the facts, is a shocking betrayal of the family loyalty that I would expect even from a liberal. Apparently I have, once again, overestimated the morality of the far left lunatic fringe. I seem to be a slow learner on that topic, but I have trouble grasping just how disgusting they will choose to be.