me: “So you don’t know what particular protocol resulted in them having their charter pulled?”
you: “Duh, I gave you the link where the Children of the Gods club kicked them out and you respond back with your nonsense.”
I’m not surprised to find you denigrating a request for detail as “nonsense” when you’re challenged.
You don’t know what the issue was between the main club and its Austin charter because the article you linked to doesn’t provide any detail.
The link you posted merely says that the Guardians of the Children (the Children of God being a cult from the 1960s) pulled the Grim Guardians charter. And so your previous comment:
“This is the same bunch of dudes that could NOT abide by the club rules of a decent riding club”
proves to be just more of the same baseless hyperbole that you and your sidekick like to deal in.
If you knew what the issue was that prompted the Guardians of the Children to pull the charter you’d post it.
But you didn’t, because the truth is you don’t know, choosing instead to poison the well by contrasting them with the “decent riding club”. That’s life in the logic optional world where informal fallacies rule.
“But you didn’t, because the truth is you don’t know, choosing instead to poison the well by contrasting them with the “decent riding club”. “
Er, the Guardians of the Children stated they threw them out because they wouldn’t abide by the rules.
You are slandering the Guardians of the Children.