Posted on 06/14/2015 6:37:02 AM PDT by ncalburt
http://wingright.org/2012/05/28/ted-cruz-pit-of-vipers-and-the-council-on-foreign-relations-member-in-his-family/
(Excerpt) Read more at wingright.org ...
Since everyone is confused why don't you just tell us which of the acronyms you feel are the good ones? Or maybe they are all bad for us and you just want to confuse the issue.
> “I have read numerous articles about what is contained in the TPP ...”
Well well well, you should get that to Alex Jones pronto! Or Art Bell; take your pick.
I think you are working in his campaign, that is why you are not addressing our concerns. All you are saying is that we should put our faith in someone who right now is supporting something very scary.I would like to argue some more with you, but as I am in the San Juans on my sailboat, and leaving to a no wifi destination, I cannot continue this argument. Except to say Cruz did a Marco Rubio. Remember Rubios immigration stance? That seriously hurt him politically, prior to that Rubio could do no wrong. Stick a fork in Cruz, he is done.
> “I have read numerous articles about what is contained in the TPP ...”
Well well well, you should get that to Alex Jones pronto! Or Art Bell; take your pick.
LOL!!
A rose by any other name.....The Supreme Court gave them carte blanc by allowing them to call treaties trade agreements. Gay of them right?
I think you’re correct.
I’ve heard that info in other Places; stating she was never on the Board of Directors.
I still say the author of this screed is just trying to foul the air where Cruz is concerned; and since that person is from FL, I’m still convinced they’re supporting Bush or Rubio .. and thus the hit piece on Cruz.
However, I think it was HotAir who did a poll; the result was Cruz 65%, Rubio 10%. That surely ruffled some feathers.
Okay - thanks - I’ll check it out.
Stick a fork in Cruz, he is done.
Make sure you get back to us when you get Wi-Fi hookup when you make it to Fantasy Island:)
Here is another answer for you.
Moved on from Cruz as a potential recipient for my vote, not from current events. It looks like the Paulbots have found a new home with Cruz though, which is interesting.
My bet is that the various True Believers (like you) have more to do with some backer than Rand Paul, since the herd has moved on but are still cohesive as a group and doing all the same things.
It’s a puzzle, and I like puzzles, but I don’t like watching my country get buried under a mountain of debt.
I have no dog in this fight.
Like what I’ve seen of Cruz, but he comes across to me as more than a little arrogant, perhaps of his intellect. Which by all accounts he should be proud of.
Rubio is not what I want to see with regard to immigration policy, but I think it is appallingly stupid for us to rule out candidate after candidate for single issues. If I remember aright that’’s pretty much what we did in 2012, and that turned out so well.
Rule two right after water which the EPA just declared they now control every drop of.
By this point, though, everybody pretty much recognizes that if a politician isn't a CFR member, he or she will have CFR members in the cabinet -- if not quite in his or her bed.
You have to know what the foreign policy experts are talking about, even if you're determined to disagree.
The Wall Street connection may be more serious, but even Reagan had CFR members in his administration.
Capitalism - good.
The TPP needs to be public.
You have only speculation and loose lips.
Isn't she making a very handsome salary without this supposed aid?
What benefit does Ted Cruz derive from voting yes on the TPP?
How many things do we worry about regarding Rubio, Christie, Bush, Huckerbee, Perry or Walker? What are their qualifications vs. those of Cruz?
Does any Republican candidate have a 100% perfect checklist of what conservatives would like to see?
Who will best stand up for the U.S. and replace our current status as a cowering paper tiger among the world's nations with that of a true superpower? Because THAT is the first step in assuring our security: "Don't ever mess with the U.S."
When you talk about 100% conservative except for one little thing, it really depends on what that one thing is doesn't it. Maybe he wants to fix Social Security/Medicare, we all want that but what if the solution is to require all those 67 and older to report to a departation station.
You Cruz fans cannot handle any honest criticism. Sad. You blast Walker and others.
Yes he/she does.
> “I’m trying to get a handle on the issue so vehemently debated here.”
There’s no point. It’s one group of anti-Cruz trolls against Cruz defenders. The trolls are trying to mix it up with lies and false inferences.
> “Are people saying that Mrs. Cruz would become the next Richard Blum (husband of Diane Feinstein) and reap insanely huge monetary rewards because of political machinations of Ted?”
First of all they’re not ‘people’. They are losers at best and morons at worst. Their objective is to attack Ted Cruz to see if anything sticks and they’re losing.
The trolls are trying to do to Ted Cruz what Sarah Slut tried to do to Rush Limbaugh. Rush is still broadcasting and educating whilst Fluke is screwing any guy with a condom or gal with a device.
> “What benefit does Ted Cruz derive from voting yes on the TPP?”
Careful there, you may blow your cover unless you’re genuinely confused. Ted Cruz has not voted on TPP. He has skimmed over it. It’s more than 700 pages and he has said he will not decide until he’s studied it in detail.
But the trolls will tell you that he means to bring forth the Anti-Christ via TPP using his wife Heidi as a Goldman Sachs front.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.