"She's 67," Hewitt said. "She'll be 69 if she wins and I think she will -- the presidency." Later in that segment, Hewitt, who is slated to be a moderator in one of the upcoming Republican presidential primary debates, elaborated on why took that position. According to Hewitt, the deck is stacked against the Republican candidate because of the Electoral College and Clinton he said was "awfully smart" and would [be] formidable financially.She won't even be the nominee. I say that with a particle of doubt of course, because like most of us, I remember those drama-queen letters the partisan media shills recounted in puff pieces -- elementary schoolkids were given the 'assignment' of writing to the Clinton White House by no-doubt non-partisan NEA members, and they begged Slick to "give Hillary more power" to impose various decrees, such as Hillarycare. Those misled inexperienced kids are now in their 30s somewhere, and possibly no less gullible now. Hillarycare was a political dead-end, even a disaster, and after the Demagogic Party lost congressional control in 1995, Gingrich led us nowhere, produced a temporarily balanced budget (but no bb amendment, no term limits, basically almost nothing from the Contract with America -- btw, NEVER AGAIN Newt), and we spent two and a half years or so waiting for impeachment and removal of Slick. Meanwhile Gore was running an illegal operation to selectively naturalize foreign Latinos and setting up his later path to an illicit fortune.
“Gingrich led us nowhere”
For all Newt’s flaws, didn’t you like that he had some take it to um fight in him? He wouldn’t accept that the Republicans should be a permanent minority in the House and there’s no way he’d roll over in front of Obama like the Republicans are doing now.