[semimojo]

Every citizen, and every officer of government who is required by Article Six to take the oath, has to determine constitutionality. If they won't, they are either a poor citizen, or a sworn officer who cannot possibly keep the oath and provide appropriate checks and balances within our form of government.

OK, so the fact that sworn officers of government (Supremes) have deemed these congressional-executive trade agreements to be constitutional, plus the fact that our elected, and sworn, representatives have continued to agree to and implement these agreements, means that they're constitutional, no?

[EternalVigilance]

OK, so the fact that sworn officers of government (Supremes) have deemed these congressional-executive trade agreements to be constitutional, plus the fact that our elected, and sworn, representatives have continued to agree to and implement these agreements, means that they're constitutional, no?

No. It means they say it is.

But they also say that denying equal protection to the sixty million or so helpless, innocent little children who have been butchered in the abortuaries since 1973 is constitutional too.

Is it?

Abortion destroys the natural law moral principles of the Declaration of Independence, our national charter, every single clause of the stated purposes of the U.S. Constitution, and the explicit, imperative equal protection requirements in two Amendments to that supreme law of our land, and the equal protection requirements of all of our state constitutions.

Who am I to believe, judges and politicians, or my Bible, the Declaration of Independence, and my own copy of the Constitution?