Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Patton@Bastogne

Thank you for posting this. If I understand correctly the TPA is the rule book for what future trade agreements can or cannot allow. The full text of TPA is available here https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/hr1314/BILLS-114hr1314eas.pdf. The TPP is a trade agreement still in negotiation and once finalized will be available to the public for 60 days before a vote, guaranteed by the TPA. If TPA is not in place then it seems there is more room for secrecy and shenanigans for all future trade agreements including TPP. Those on this thread are simply new here for the single intent of undermining Cruz and Walker (I’ve seen your posts and sign up date), or they are against Free Trade as a rule. Or they feel there is too much wiggle room for dems to change, or over ride, the TPA? I am not arguing for or against but trying to cut through the detractor’s talking points and pin point the legitimate questions or concerns.


44 posted on 06/13/2015 5:23:35 AM PDT by Thidwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Thidwick

Ha ha....so if we disagree we are newbies!!!!!!!.....

I ‘ve been here since ‘99
.....and Diogenesis since 2000

...and you’ve been here since......oh 2006


57 posted on 06/13/2015 5:35:12 AM PDT by Guenevere (If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do........Psalms 11:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson