Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jjotto
Although two Justices disagreed, the question has never been revived...

Because the Senate is the only body with standing to challenge a "trade agreement" as being in violation of the Treaty clause. And the Senate no longer wants this power.

Ted Cruz, as a member of the Senate, could mount a campaign to restore the Treaty authorization clause of the constitution, but instead he signed on the TPA, which removes even the power of the cloture to stop a bad treaty "trade agreement."

118 posted on 06/13/2015 9:18:30 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

Yep.

Although I’m not aware of even one senator opposing any trade negotiating agreement based on the treaty approval clause.


121 posted on 06/13/2015 9:38:26 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson