Does anyone understand the ramifications of this?
People naturally gravitate to people of same ethnicity. It’s simply human nature. All this will do is inflame racial tensions even more than it already is under Obola.
What this does is give the gibsmedats a new place to go shopping in the homes of working people.
We don’t want them here. I have worked hard and sacrificed much to achieve where I am and I don’t want my town poisoned with these feral animals and their shit culture.
This goes beyond race. Look how many affluent black people don’t go back to live in the old neighborhood just to make a “statement.” They fled the crime and poor schools just like the whites did — and who again runs these cities and schools that people of all income levels are desperate to flee??? I live in a mixed neighborhood racially, but we are all in the same socio-economic ‘class’ and we all take care of our homes. I think our PINO is warning us that we need to accommodate all these nice “immigrants” he and his minions are streaming in from Africa and the Middle East.
The problem (particularly here in NJ) is that blacks have nobody to pay their bills; the Fed will provide food stamps and free lunches, but there is nobody to pay cops or teachers (so they are getting no police protection or education - though a lot of money is spent on both anyway).
This is a revamp of the Quartering Act which preceded the American Revolution; Americans are being forced to house/feed/school an allotment of blacks and illegals. As the white population continues its steep drop, this will become moot; there will be no “white neighborhoods” left in a decade or two.
It will do one other thing, even more insidious: It will destroy property values.
That is the idea. Ferguson, Baltimore, etc. are the putsch from the left and "diversity of neighborhoods" are the putsch from the right. Communist playbook.
“. All this will do is inflame racial tensions even more than it already is under Obola.”
That’s the plan. Incite race wars, create civil unrest, impose martial law, suspend Constitutional rights, become dictator.
HUD drops investigation of residents who protested against low-income housing
September 20, 1994
HUD drops investigation of residents who protested against
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In late August, federal housing officials dropped an investigation of three Berkeley, Calif., residents who protested the renovation of a hotel for low- income housing, and in early September announced guidelines designed to prevent probes of activities protected by the First Amendment.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development guidelines were written in response to pressure from American Civil Liberties Union Legal Director Stephen Shapiro and members of the press who contended that people who peacefully protested housing projects in their neighborhoods should not be prosecuted for exercising their First Amendment rights.
At an early September news conference, HUD’s Roberta Achtenberg, assistant secretary for fair housing and equal employment, told reporters that HUD will continue to investigate complaints of conduct or speech that is “coercive, threatening, intimidating, or harassing,” but not complaints about “neighbors involved in a peaceful protest,” according to Associated Press reports.
Since the Berkeley case, HUD has identified 34 complaints involving free-speech issues, Achtenberg told AP at the press conference. She said 11 have been dismissed under the new guidelines and the rest will be reviewed.
[Snip]