Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World’s Most Sophisticated Bomb Ready for Production
AIN online ^ | June 12, 2015 | Chris Pocock

Posted on 06/12/2015 6:48:22 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

A brace of Raytheon small diameter bombs hang from a U.S. Air Force F-15E. The Strike Eagle will be the first operational platform for the second edition SDB II.

After a six-month delay caused by a couple of test failures, the world’s most sophisticated air-launched bomb is back on track. The Raytheon GBU-53/B Small Diameter Bomb II passed the Pentagon’s Milestone C review last month, and will soon enter low-rate initial production. The SDB II has a ”tri-mode” seeker that allows simultaneous attacks in adverse weather and against moving targets at up to 40 nm range, from a subsonic launch at about 35,000 feet.

“We tripped a bit last fall,” admitted Jim Sweetman, Raytheon’s program director. He told AIN that the bomb failed a qualification test of its ability to withstand the type corrosive atmosphere to which it might be exposed on the [U.S.] Navy’s aircraft carriers–salt-water spray and fumes. “That cost time, but we’ve solved it,” he said. Then there was an internal cable failure on the second live fire test that caused the bomb to miss its target. “We found the root cause, and the repeat test was successful,” he added. Sweetman noted that some half-dozen guided test flights last year without a warhead were all successful.

The tri-mode seeker includes a semi-active laser, a millimeter-wave radar and an uncooled imaging infrared seeker. Some other “smart” bombs have dual-mode guidance, but Raytheon officials are not aware of a competing weapon with three guidance options. The predecessor SDB I offered only GPS guidance to fixed targets and did not contain the dual-band two-way datalink of the SDB II. The first version was also heavier, with a necessarily larger warhead that did not feature the multi-effects shaped-charge/blast-fragmentation warhead of the SDB II. The second version is also smart enough to sort, categorize and prioritize targets.

Despite the sophistication, the SDB II is “affordable,” according to Sweetman. U.S. Air Force assistant acquisition secretary Dr. William LaPlante said recently that the cost per round will be about $115,000, some $65,000 below the goal set when the SDB II entered development five years ago. Raytheon has managed its workforce well and controlled costs, he said.

The new weapon will be fielded first on U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles, where the maximum load will be 28 bombs, although 16 will be the normal loadout, all on fuselage stations. Then the U.S. Navy will add it to the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. The SDB II is also slated for the F-35B and F-35C versions of the Joint Strike Fighter. The smaller internal weapons bays of the F-35B can each still carry four SDB IIs, plus an AMRAAM missile. But in any case, the Lightning II will not receive the Block 4 software required to drop the SDB II until 2022.

Jeff White, Raytheon’s SDB II business development manager, told AIN that export prospects for the weapon include operators of the F-15E, and all 13 of the F-35 international countries, because it will come ready-integrated with the stealth fighter. Raytheon’s British subsidiary is pitching the SDB II as a “low-cost, low-risk” alternative to MBDA’s proposal to meet the UK’s SPEAR (Selectable Precision Effects At Range) Capability 3 requirement. There is potential for work on the SDB II worth some $500 million to be placed in the UK, including electronic subassemblies, fuses and integration onto the Eurofighter Typhoon, according to TJ Marsden, chief weapons system engineer with Raytheon UK.

Meanwhile, White told AIN that Raytheon is working on “translation software” for low-cost integration onto the F-16. That would allow European countries now flying the Fighting Falcon to start training and using the SDB II before their F-35s arrive.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; raytheon; sdb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: lafroste
" I guess that is the price we pay for having an acronym happy society."

Yeah, AHSs are a bitch.

21 posted on 06/12/2015 8:05:41 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CodeJockey

External carry is an option for the F-35, as well. It is just another way for people to whine about the F-35. that is the cost of going stealth.


22 posted on 06/12/2015 8:42:50 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Lightning II will not receive the Block 4 software required to drop the SDB II until 2022

This is 2015. Can’t they hire some apps programmer and knock this out in a weekend?
WW2 was 4 years for us.
How long does the Defense dept think the next war will be?


23 posted on 06/12/2015 8:44:12 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
[...] allows simultaneous attacks in adverse weather and against moving targets at up to 40 nm range [...]

Are they talking about nanometers - i.e., billionths of a meter (= 10 Å)?

Regards,

24 posted on 06/12/2015 8:46:48 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The next President will get use out of these in cleaning up Obama’s “Muzzies Gone Wild” 8 year Spring Break party mess.


25 posted on 06/12/2015 9:06:38 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Hillary - Ethically sleazy and politically stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

40 Nautical Miles range


26 posted on 06/12/2015 9:07:56 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Hillary - Ethically sleazy and politically stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

I assume it means Nautical Miles.

But hey, you guys know best.


27 posted on 06/12/2015 9:11:35 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary, because it's time for a POTUS without a SCROTUS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
40 nanometers does not sound like much of a range.

Yes, but is extremely accurate within that range.

28 posted on 06/12/2015 9:15:31 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative; Buckeye Battle Cry
Thanks, fellahs!

Regards,

29 posted on 06/12/2015 10:08:42 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
The USA produced about 15,000 P-51's in WWII. At the time, it was cutting-edge technology and the best in the skys. Each copy cost $50,900. If you believe the US Bureau of Labor's inflation statistics, in today's dollars that is $650,000 per

And in today's dollars, how much does a MANPADS cost, and how long would a P-51D survive against one?


30 posted on 06/12/2015 1:05:57 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson