Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: parksstp

Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t TPA require a 60 vote super majority to defeat subsequent Obama trade deals, like TPP, that have unacceptable features? That’s quite a hurdle to jump which probably explains why none of these fast tracked things have ever been defeated.


69 posted on 06/11/2015 7:46:07 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Menehune56; parksstp
"Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t TPA require a 60 vote super majority to defeat subsequent Obama trade deals, like TPP, that have unacceptable features? That’s quite a hurdle to jump which probably explains why none of these fast tracked things have ever been defeated."

Absolutely and this paid troll is lying to you.

TPA ensures that any agreement submitted to Congress requires only a 51 vote majority to pass in the Senate.

And no amount of votes can keep it from taking place. The vote will occur.

"Although Congress cannot explicitly transfer its powers to the executive branch, the 1974 trade promotion authority had the effect of delegating power to the executive, minimizing consideration of the public interest, and limiting the legislature's influence over the bill to an up or down vote:[18]

It allowed the executive branch to select countries for, set the substance of, negotiate and then sign trade agreements without prior congressional approval.

It allowed the executive branch to negotiate trade agreements covering more than just tariffs and quotas.

It established a committee system, comprising 700 industry representatives appointed by the president, to serve as advisors to the negotiations. Throughout trade talks, these individuals had access to confidential negotiating documents. Most members of Congress and the public had no such access, and there were no committees for consumer, health, environmental or other public interests.

It empowered the executive branch to author an agreement's implementing legislation without Congressional input.

It required the executive branch to notify Congress 90 days before signing and entering into an agreement, but allowed unlimited time for the implementing legislation to be submitted.

It forced a floor vote on the agreement and its implementing legislation in both chambers of Congress; the matters could not "die in committee."

It eliminated several floor procedures, including Senate unanimous consent, normal debate and cloture rules, and the ability to amend the legislation.

It prevented filibuster by limiting debate to 20 hours in each chamber.

It elevated the Special Trade Representative (STR) to the cabinet level, and required the Executive Office to house the agency.

The 1979 version of the authority changed the name of the STR to the U.S. Trade Representative.[18]

The 2002 version of the authority created an additional requirement for 90-day notice to Congress before negotiations could begin.[18]

96 posted on 06/11/2015 8:28:13 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson