The "list" after "to wit:" is not something we'll likely ever see from the folks that depend on govt (read OUR) money to continue their research. Well, as long as it meets the lefts goals to beat us in to submission with more and more BS. Say, how's that environmental justice chart working in your neighborhood? (Re: post from yesterday about the epa enviro-justice league)
1 posted on
06/11/2015 8:11:17 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
2 posted on
06/11/2015 8:12:07 AM PDT by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: rktman
Who needs science when we have a consensus??
3 posted on
06/11/2015 8:19:44 AM PDT by
eyeamok
To: rktman
Corrupt politicians are corrupting every institution in our country. Normal political methods are no longer capable of correcting the effects of the ongoing corruption.
To: rktman
[Where is the Science?] It's really not complicated.
5 posted on
06/11/2015 9:12:00 AM PDT by
RetSignman
(Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
To: rktman
I now call it, climate transition to annoy the climaphobes. Why do they support cisclimatism?
6 posted on
06/11/2015 9:15:24 AM PDT by
outofsalt
( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
To: rktman
To: rktman
"It doesn't take a PhD to know what science is and isn't; climate science as practiced by the IPCC, Al Gore and their fellow travelers does not qualify. Yep, even a 5th-grader proved that with her (award-winning) Science Fair project::
(Click here for full-sized image...)
Her conclusion: "AGW is NOT "Good Science"!:
12 posted on
06/12/2015 9:00:18 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson