Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
I think you and I have a very different understanding of how the Juvenile court system functions.

The judge granted a motion for expungement filed by one of the Duggar sisters. That's how the judge had jurisdiction over the matter.

You are simply incorrect if you think a judge can otherwise (i.e. without the expungement motion/order) wave his hands & order something for a situation that was never before him in court.

Protection for Juveniles is always foremost in these sorts of cases, and no order needs to be issued because all players know the rules.

Once again, you're talking about court cases, not police records. Without the expungement motion & order, a court has zero jurisdiction over a matter never before the court. This is Government 101 stuff.

228 posted on 06/09/2015 8:57:49 AM PDT by gdani (No sacred cows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: gdani
I'm talking about the entire system. The police, the Social Workers, the courts.

Everyone in the F***ing system knows better, and i'm quite tired of you trying to befuddle the issue.

There is NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY that thinks they can get away with releasing information about juveniles, with or without a judge's order. You do that, and your @$$ is toast.

I think before this is over, we are going to find some toasted @$$es of some officials.

229 posted on 06/09/2015 9:00:35 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson