Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Louis Foxwell
The judge IS the court. There is no legal distinction.

What's your point? Mine is the judge had no jurisdiction. The matter was never before him. It never reached court.

221 posted on 06/09/2015 6:50:41 AM PDT by gdani (No sacred cows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: gdani

If the judge acted on the case he must have known about it. If he knew about it it was before him. If it was before him he had jurisdiction.
A court case need not be filed for a judge to act. Often a judge will determine if a case may be presented. Judges may become involved before a prosecutor or other agent of the court files an action. Granting a warrant is a case in point.


223 posted on 06/09/2015 8:03:49 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson