Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountn man

A court doesn’t accept unlicensed therapy.

Your DOJ study involved licensed therapy received by juvvie sex offenders WHILE they were juvvies.

Those stats are meaningless for perps who never received licensed therapy as a juvvie.

You’re the one that can’t back anything up.

I knew exactly what the stats said for your information. There are many studies out there. Not all of them so ‘hopeful’.

None of the hopeful ones involve perps who got therapy in adulthood however.

Those stats are dismal.

Don’t blame me for pointing out that JimBob cared more about his public persona than he did his kids getting the help they needed. Including and especially Josh, since his receiving treatment was actually probably MORE important than his sisters getting treatment. Because HE was the one that could damage many many many lives if left untreated.

And in ‘07, Josh was 19. No longer a juvenile. Again, all the fault of JimBob.

When you run across reoffender stats where the therapy involves hanging drywall and painting walls let me know.


102 posted on 06/08/2015 4:31:12 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: Black Agnes

The “christians” defending the Duggars are disgusting and shameful.


103 posted on 06/08/2015 4:33:30 PM PDT by jimbo807
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Black Agnes
You seem to conveniently miss the point that he did receive counseling BEFORE he was 18.

The study quoted NEVER said ANYTHING about them having licensed or unlicensed therapy.

What it did say was this:
Similarly, clinical data point to variability in risk for future sex offending as an adult. Multiple short- and long-term clinical followup studies of juvenile sex offenders consistently demonstrate that a large majority (about 85–95 percent) of sex-offending youth have no arrests or reports for future sex crimes. When previously sex-offending youth do have future arrests, they are far more likely to be for nonsexual crimes such as property or drug offenses than for sex crimes (Alexander, 1999; Caldwell, 2002; Reitzel and Carbonell, 2007)

Nothing about counseling.

I knew exactly what the stats said for your information. There are many studies out there. Not all of them so ‘hopeful’

You know sh.. You're just grasping.

I just looked at just the first 10 reports. NONE of them hint at what you claim as being "not all as hopeful"

You claim that I'm the one who can't back anything up.

Here you go.
Google search "doj study on juvenile sex offenders molestations"

There's a whole list of studies for your perusal. MAYBE you can find one that will back up what you say.

Here is the DOJ study that I actually quoted:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/227763.pdf

Tell you what Buttercup. I posted my sources AND I did actual quotes.

Put up or shut up.

Let's see these so called studies that you've SUPPOSEDLY read.

Google is a miracle.
If these reports exist that you've SUPPOSEDLY read, then you should find them...
in oh...
A FEW SECONDS...maybe a few minutes AT MOST.

132 posted on 06/08/2015 5:10:15 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson