Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater
With a) we’d be backtracking on decades of foreign policy in the region and opening it all up to God-knows-what fallout. Not to say it would be the wrong answer, just an unpredictable one that we spent years and many billions of dollars trying to avoid. Who wants to be the guy who makes that call?

Wouldn't that be preferable to explaining how we're going to devote more trillions and God know how many lives to propping up the corrupt and brutal regime that's running Iraq now? The one who destroyed their own military and whose own people won't fight for them? Admit the mistake and cut the loses, don't go running down the same doomed path.

With b), you don’t s**tcan a long-time ally and NATO partner to get back at some thugs in pickup trucks.

Every day in many ways Turkey under Erdoğan shows that they are not the ally they once were, and are in many ways working against our interests. So if the relationship is dead or dying it was Turkey that did it.

28 posted on 06/08/2015 12:50:27 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

I say the preferable option is more or less what we’re doing now—mostly nothing. Some intel/airstrikes. I would say no more free weapons to the IA, though that would invite Iran to start supplying them with weapons which would further codify that incestuous relationship.

That whole region is a disaster.


34 posted on 06/08/2015 2:34:49 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson