Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmacusa

Very true..my father, who turns 100 in a few months, was a platoon sergeant in a maintenance company in the 3rd Armored Division. They came ashore in late June and early July, then plunged into the fight. Over the next 11 months, they lost over 600 Shermans (out of an original complement of 232). Many of those tanks were repaired and returned to service, creating that endless stream of Shermans the Werhmacht sergeant referred to.

There has been much discussion about the deficiencies of the Sherman—and that list was long. The early models were under-gunned and under-armored; ammo storage on some variants made the tank more prone to explode if it was hit. But the Sherman was designed for ease of maintenance, and in that regard, it was superior to other tanks. The radial engine was also used in American trainer aircraft, so spare parts were readily available. Electrical systems and other components could be easily replaced as well.

By comparison, the more-complex Panthers and Tigers were more subject to breakdowns. If they suffered more than moderate damage, they were usually written off, because the Panzer units didn’t have the time or resources to complete more complex repairs on the battlefield.

But perhaps the real difference was provided by men like my father. He grew up on a farm and had experience working on tractors and other types of equipment. Other men in his unit had been mechanics, or worked as maintenance technicians in factories. They were, in the words of one writer, “crafty with their hands,” and took readily to the task of fixing damaged tanks and getting them back into battle. Their skill was one reason the 3rd Armored could lose 600 Shermans and remain a combat effective unit. Many of those knocked-out M4s were back in battle in a matter of days, thanks to the efficiency of our logistics system and the skill of our mechanics.

During a recent coversation, I asked my Dad what it was like to pull a tank from the battlefield—sometimes under enemy artillery fire. He said their Diamond T wrecker could do 20 mph with a light tank on the hook; if they were retrieving a Sherman, the wrecker’s top speed was about 10 mph, given the weight of the medium tank (37 tons).


35 posted on 06/06/2015 9:06:20 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: ExNewsExSpook
The Panthers and Tigers were labor intensive to build and repair. Besides being way more heavily armored than the Sherman their superiority over the Sherman was their main guns, the 75mm high velocity in the Panther and the dreaded 88mm in the Tiger. In the latter the 88mm was probably one of the finest artillery /anti-tank/anti-aircraft weapons ever produced. It's range when used against tanks was over a mile. Not content with just one variant the Germans produced the King Tiger, a heavier tank with an 88mm high velocity gun with a range of almost two miles and a real monster, the "Jagdtiger'' which mounted a 128mm main gun and was so heavy it's designers didn't bother trying to design a motor to turn the turret deciding instead to simply make a kind of armored box around the gun. In addition to this the Germans had at least a dozen different types of tracked tank destroyers of all kinds. God Almighty the Krauts didn't fool around when it came to making arms.
36 posted on 06/06/2015 10:42:59 PM PDT by jmacusa (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: ExNewsExSpook

God bless your father for his service. And his longevity.


37 posted on 06/06/2015 10:46:15 PM PDT by jmacusa (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson