Posted on 06/03/2015 9:52:41 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
Russia’s defense and industrial sector is developing a promising aircraft carrier for the Navy worth up to $5.6 billion, which has no analogs in the world, Northern Fleet Commander, Admiral Vladimir Korolyov said on Monday.
The new aircraft carrier will enable the Russian Navy to operate more effectively, the admiral said, referring to the developments by the Krylov Research State Center in St. Petersburg but gave no estimates for the new ship.
The center’s developments are known under the codename Project 23000E Storm.
"Considering that the Northern Fleet forces perform a great variety of missions in the distant Oceanic zone, the presence of an aircraft carrier in the fleet in the future will help address these tasks more effectively," the admiral said.
Currently, the Admiral Kuznetsov heavy aircraft carrier bears the main load for the practical drills of deck-based aircraft, the commander said.
‘In a perspective, however, we should have a full-fledged aircraft carrier complex in our fleet surpassing world analogs by its characteristics. This is required by new challenges and threats emerging in the world," the admiral said.
"If we speak about what kind of an aircraft carrier the fleet needs, this should be a ship corresponding to the requirements of tomorrow rather than of today," the Northern Fleet commander said.
Nevskoye Design Bureau Head Sergei Vlasov told Tass news agency the promising aircraft carrier might cost from $1.8 billion to $5.63 billion at the current ruble/dollar exchange rate.
Its development will take about ten years. However, there are no technical specifications for a ship of this class so far, Vlasov said.
Nevertheless, aircraft carriers have been included in Russia’s shipbuilding program until 2050.
The Nevskoye Design Bureau, which is Russia’s sole aircraft carrier designer, is carrying out preparatory works on this project.
So would we as a nation today, right now, be better off with no carriers in our fleet? Answer Yes or No.
No, absolutely not. Those carriers are very handy when it comes to expeditionary warfare against enemy states that don’t have decent navies, which covers most countries. Against a country like China or Russia, their strategic value is neutralised by their extreme vulnerability to submarines. However, the number of carriers at the expense of other things, particularly attack subs, is a matter for debate.
Uninformed lips sink ships.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.