Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ifinnegan

No kangaroo court here. Fact is that LE has info, video, radio,photos, etc. common sense says if any were exonerating for them it would be out. It ain’t. If any of it demonstrated a crime in progress by anyone other than the police we would have seen it as well. We haven’t. Like Sherlock Holme’s hound the absence of something speaks loudly to one who has ears. You are convinced that all those present down range were criminals. On what do you base this?


114 posted on 06/01/2015 2:07:39 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute
-- ... common sense says if any were exonerating for them it would be out. --

There is no upside to the cops to make the information public, and the DA has a pretty good argument against publicly going negative against the accused.

Assuming there are some wrongful arrests in there, the tables will turn. I wouldn't bet on the wrongly accused to get a fair shake in court. Courts are biased in favor of the government (the hand that feeds them), and the bigger the stakes (the bigger the screw up), the less likely a remedy.

I don't believe the official version(s), but am open to evidence.

115 posted on 06/01/2015 2:18:49 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

You sound exactly like the Ferguson people who were quite naive about investigations, evidence and time frames.

And, your comment is the epitome of kangaroo court, but you don’t realize it.


116 posted on 06/01/2015 2:21:42 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson