On one hand she's saying porn is the greatest thing ever. On the other she's seeking pity points because her useless education in "women's studies" is so expensive at Duke. I hate to see the mess this girl will become.
Whatever happened to that girl from Duke University, who claimed she had to do pornography to pay her high tuition? And claimed that if they had given her more financial aid, she wouldn’t be forced to do that?
She also made some bizarro statements about how females are empowered by porn, taking control of their sex lives, etc. and that she herself had been watching porn since age 11.
I think part of what is going on has to do with the whole sexual revolution since the ‘60s. Young people nowadays have been raised in a culture in which it’s considered ok to have sex with any number of partners, any gender of partners, and it’s ok to have recreational sex with someone, regardless of whether you are in a relationship with that person or not.
All of that feeds an idea in these girls minds that there is nothing wrong with doing pornography. The promise of some quick cash makes some people do this, sad to say.
They talked about Belle Knox in the film.
She also made some bizarro statements about how females are empowered by porn, taking control of their sex lives, etc. and that she herself had been watching porn since age 11.
Yep, and as her "shelf life" expired, she found herself doing "extreme" porn to extend it (google "forced oral" at your own risk).
Not quite the "empowered feminist" she thought she was.
Anyone that has seen pornography knows that this is BS. Women in porn are no more than a series of holes for the male to satisfy himself with. Sorry to be crude but that's what it is. He moves her from position to position, she is passive, he does what he wants to do, she fakes "pleasure" and that's about it.
Some empowerment.