Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
My point was more about anyone assuming that feminists don’t care about women being exploited in the porn industry.

Ah, thanks for that. Went right over my head! (Guess I'm an example eh?)

42 posted on 06/01/2015 6:31:46 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: usconservative

No problem!
I happened to have been living in Minneapolis when the following occurred:
“The idea of combating pornography through civil rights litigation in the United States was first developed in 1980. Linda Boreman, who had appeared in the pornographic film Deep Throat as “Linda Lovelace,” published a memoir, Ordeal, in which she stated that she had been beaten and raped by her ex-husband Chuck Traynor, and violently coerced into making Deep Throat. Boreman held a press conference, with Minneapolis based feminist Andrea Dworkin, Minneapolis feminist lawyer Catharine MacKinnon, and members of Women Against Pornography supporting her, in which she made her charges public for the press corps. Dworkin, MacKinnon, and Gloria Steinem began discussing the possibility of legal redress for Boreman under federal civil rights law. Two weeks later, they met with Boreman to discuss the idea of pursuing a lawsuit against Traynor and other pornographers. She was interested, but Steinem discovered that the statute of limitations for a possible suit had passed, and Boreman backed off. Dworkin and MacKinnon, however, began to discuss the possibility of civil rights litigation as an approach to combatting pornography.”— Wikipedia


43 posted on 06/01/2015 6:47:08 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson