I agree. I was being sarcastic as FR has a large contingent of GOpe that swear to vote GOP ‘no matter what’. So since one of their posterboys molesting kids falls under their ‘no matter what’. I imagine they will rush to defend him on that basis alone.
they can’t have it both ways.
Norm, I knew you were being sarcastic and I agree with you on the “lesser evil” theory.
Now now.
We still have a lot of people who don’t care about gays getting access to kids.
And they will tell you voting third party or write in instead of Mitt Romney was the same as voting for Obama. They love them some pedophilia in the Republican Party, and they are glad they did their part to advance it.
Oh come on! No Conservative who held their nose and voted for Romney as the lesser of two evils is going to defend a pedophile, even a Republican one.
What's your solution? Refuse to vote for any Republican who doesn't meet our Conservative standards 100% because they might also be pedophiles?
Those of us Conservatives who held our noses and voted for Romney will not cover for this. The perv has to pay for what he did, and our side shown it will take out the trash when we find them, even our own. It's bad enough to have to put up with this kind of slant from the left, without using it against each other.