“If the authorities have evidence of a crime committed by anyone let them take it before a judge.”
They have and are. Pray for justice.
If LE had wanted a killing spree while “lying in wait behind a scoped rifle at one hundred yards of less” don’t you think there would be more than 9 dead and 18 wounded? What stopped them, pray tell, if it was their intent to fire indiscriminately and take down as many as they could? Given the situation, Thank God there were only 9 dead. Others have said that LE counter-fire against the gang shooters is what prevented more deaths.
1. You have failed utterly to do any of your own digging into this and so have zero idea of the reality and are trusting strictly to a very limited (and factually flawed) group of "official" news stories.
2. You have reasons of your own for promoting and defending LEO in this when both available evidence and the law indicate clearly that they were totally in the wrong and abusive with their authority.
It seems to me you are one or the other. If you were honestly doing your own due diligence and researching who many of those folks in jail actually are, if you shot enough handguns and long guns to know the difference between the range needed for a decent pistol shot and a rifle shot, if you first-hand for decades knew and hung around Harley riders of all types including club-joiners and loners, if you respected the rule of law more than the authority of a badge and understood the profound difference ... then you would perceive that Waco travesty sets a very dangerous precedent that endangers American freedom FAR more than all the Bandidos and Cossacks (apparently many Cossacks clubs are simply riding buddy type groups of zero criminal enterprise) could do combined.
What do you think wasoute? Am I missing something?