[rbg81]

To the Post, this is about empowering the ladies, not the men:

---

Really? This is the lie of the century. Monogamy is empowering to women, not men. Why? Simply because women are less sought after once they reach 30 (and for many, even before that). In contrast, many men are considered more attractive as they age, especially if they get wealthier. A wealthy middle aged man is much more attractive to the opposite sex (and still fertile) than a wealthy middle aged woman.

If the Libs had their way, only the homos would get married. And they are certainly not monogamous even after they are married.

[Zathras]

This is the next thing being floated.
Polyamorous.
There are reasons so many people are moving to Portland and Seattle.

[Jack Hammer]

Finally I can marry my horse....

[wideawake]

“Aldous Huxley, please pick up the white courtesy phone.”

[Impy]

Jessie, advertised, “I’m into building deep and loving relationships that add to the joy and aliveness of being human.” She talked her husband into “ethical non-monogamy.”

You, Jessie, are a whore. And your husband is half a fag for allowing you to be one.

[HLPhat]

Female Chimpanzees are observed to engage in promiscuous behavior.

One hypothesis is that this behavior decreases the likelihood of infanticide of the female’s offspring by competing males who’ll be less likely to kill an infant when there’s a possibility it’s theirs.

Polygamy is common among human tribal predators. How’s that usually work out?

[Sir Napsalot]

How would trust survive in an ‘ethical non-monogamy’ in other matters in life?

If you don’t have trust, can there be a relationship?