I have long thought that no-fault divorce laws combined with "family law" (a cruel oxymoron) courts where a woman can leave her husband for any or no reason at all, get the kids and the house plus a large child support income tax free, and "uncle dad" gets to see the kids two weekends a month and one night a week at best. Authority to discipline goes to the mom, and if dad does something she doesn't like, Child Services is right there to track dad down and remedy it -- mom doesn't have to hire a lawyer.
On the other hand, if mom lets the kids flake out on visitation ("Johnny had other plans this weekend so he's not going to be spending it with you, sorry, I can't do anything about it") or if mom spends the child support money on stuff for herself, dad has to HIRE A LAWYER to fight it, and he's so broke from the child support payments he can't afford it.
How do I know this? I have lived it first hand and seen it in literally dozens and dozens of friends and relatives.
In my opinion, easy no-fault woman-favored divorce in the U.S. has contributed hugely to the rise in homosexuality in our culture.
H.L. Mencken once wrote that women resent bachelors because they've cheated some woman out of the profit and pleasure of a divorce. How much more true that is today than the day he wrote it.
I've often scratched my head over why the "family values" crowd obsess over homosexuals while rarely saying a word about no-fault divorce and divorce laws that create windfalls for women leaving marriages for no good reason other than egos, but then I realized why: homos are only 2-3% of the population, which isn't a substantial constituency. People who profit from no-fault divorce and alimony are legion, in contrast. Divorce courts are also big business and the lawyers who keep the system running smoothly wield a lot of political clout.
In fact, no-fault divorce is probably responsible for a LOT of fatherless boys becoming homosexual.
Not to mention gang members or other criminals.