Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: henkster
No reason to deploy bombers that are no longer in production is probably the thought here, and flying only one type of bomber in combat makes the logistics and maintenance easier.

Considering the training time delays for converting -17 & -24 crews to the -29, that is exactly the decision one would expect from someone who knows the A-bomb will preempt everything.

31 posted on 05/27/2015 11:42:57 AM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Hebrews 11:6

I don’t think retraining ground and air crew for the B29 would have been that difficult. These were veterans who knew their business. And LeMay has already worked out the kinks in getting peak efficiency in flying them in combat.

At this time, there are four B29 plants in more or less full production, collectively turning out about 300 planes per month. I went to law school because I’m bad at math, but matching the existing fleet with new production I could see fleets of 1000 bombers flying from both Okinawa and the Marianas by the end of the year.

As it was, over 3200 B29s were actually produced, and in September the government cancelled orders for an additional 5000 of them.


32 posted on 05/27/2015 12:13:40 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson