[mac_truck]

I have heard one supposed statement that 3 bikers were killed by other bikers. The problem with that is the person remained anonymous.

I'd suggest you carefully read the first hand account yourself and stop relying on third parties for information. There are some basic facts in there which cannot be disputed and will help guide you to the truth. It should also be painfully obvious why an eyewitness would want to remain anonymous in this situation.

[TexasGator]

“It should also be painfully obvious why an eyewitness would want to remain anonymous in this situation. “

1. You expect that a biker might whack you, or
2. You expect that a cop might whack you.

But a cop wouldn’t whack you if you are pointing the finger against the Bandidos ... unless the cops are actually part of the Bandidos gang.

But I was told that the Cossacks were a front for the cops.

So, here we have a Cossack, probably an undercover cop, pointing the finger at the Bandidos who is afraid his fellow cops will whack him for exposing their undercover front.

Clear now?

[precisionshootist]

Can you explain why this eyewitness wasn't arrested like the 170 others most of which clearly had nothing to do with the shootings?

Odd now everyone else is held on million dollar bail but the one person that supports a police version of events is available for comment with cover of anominity