Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

3 posted on 05/26/2015 3:02:39 PM PDT by TigersEye (If You Are Ignorant, Don't Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
CALLER: Thank you, Rush. Hey, Rush, two quick points. One, we did not go to war in Iraq over weapons of mass destruction. We went to war over the lack of weapons inspectors being able to do their jobs. And number two, contrary to a caller last week you had, even if George Bush had decided to, quote, unquote, not invade Iraq, the next day he still had the problems with what do I do with the sanctions, what do I do with the no fly zones.

Good points. WMDs were far from the only reasons we went into Iraq.

Let's set the context first. We were in a state of war with Iraq, under a cease fire.

I left out the 500,000+ people Saddam had killed because, after all, who cares about those filthy little brown people. Right? /s

6 posted on 05/26/2015 3:07:49 PM PDT by TigersEye (If You Are Ignorant, Don't Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

bkmk


12 posted on 05/26/2015 3:23:25 PM PDT by Canedawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

People see WMD and they think “nuclear bomb”. Nukes take centrifuges. Bombs require testing that can be detected. If we discovered gas centrifuges or recorded a blast test I’ve never seen it reported. It’s not in your list of links.

What Saddam had was poison gas like sarin and sulfur mustard. He had used it on Iran and on the Kurds. The WMDs we found were artillery shells filled with poison gas and they may well have dated back before the first Gulf War.


23 posted on 05/27/2015 12:29:03 AM PDT by Pelham (The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson