Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thefactor

“Two different arguments” - and YOU started the second one.

No one is “defending convicted felons from carrying guns for the sole reason of committing crime”.

That is a straw man argument that you made up.

The issue is law abiding people who wish to be able to defend themselves from the criminals. They are subject to arrest under NY’s draconian gun ban laws simply for having the bad luck to be “Stopped [Questioned] and Frisked”.

If you think convicted felons are the only people being stopped and frisked then you live in a fantasy world.


48 posted on 05/27/2015 6:29:13 AM PDT by WayneS (Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: WayneS
I suggest you look up the definition of reasonable suspicion. Is everyone we stop and question guilty? Of course not. Do we stop only people we suspect of illegally carrying a firearm? Of course not. You can stop and question for any crime.

You're acting like any law abiding citizen is simply stopped on the street on their way to work. It's just not the case. SQ&F is good law. NYC carry laws are not. Two different things.

49 posted on 05/27/2015 6:52:53 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson