“I would have to question you...and in a ‘sneaky’ manner, whatever that might be.”
What it means is that you obviously hurl unsubstantiated accusations in order to get someone to go on the defensive and reveal details. Yet you want everyone to respect your privacy.
So I could be like you and say you are member of a Mormon spinoff cult that denies the real Trinity. Of course that is unsubstantiated, but in order to refute that you have to say, “no I believe in the Trinity, I’m Baptist”. Bingo.
“I made a statement of what I think, based on facts you gave”
No, you formulated lie upon lie based on your vile imagination. You have called people pedophiles who have not been convicted of such. You have called me an idolater. You have called me a cult member. You have claimed the Duggar parents are guilty of incestuous acts and public indecency.
Why? Is it because you can’t get your hands on Josh Duggar to crucify him or castrate him? Is it because you can’t get justice for what someone did to you, so you have to lash out at everyone who does not buy into your deranged mis-perception of reality?
You have said some fairly sick stuff. Don’t get your feelings too hurt when it comes back to bite you.
It is I who believes that the Duggar parents sexualizing the environment of their young children makes them guilty of emotional incest, not Catherine.
Hey, you were the one who gushed about how impressed you were with Bill Gothard after meeting him. No one had to “hurl accusations” in order to “get you to go on the defensive and reveal details.” You favor the dramatic, don’t you?
“Your vile imaginations...” You’re making me conjure up images of Dana Carvey’s church lady in my head, now.
But while we’re at it, take a moment to wipe the spittle off your lips, and we’ll get straight what I did and didn’t do, all right?
I didn’t use the word pedophile. I don’t know if it can be applied to a minor who abuses someone younger. But Josh Duggar is an admitted sexual pervert, and if you have a problem with applying that to someone who felt up a five year-old while holding her on his lap, then you, lady, are in the grip of some serious problems.
Yes, you’re one of the few who idolize that weird family to the point of defending sexual perversion from one of their members. Getting so wrapped up in the lives of TV people isn’t healthy. Maybe it’s time to take a step back.
The Duggar father was grinding his privates into his wife’s butt in front of his daughter. Indecent? Without a doubt. I thought they were just weird, but now I’m coming to realize they’re a bunch of freaks. And anyone who thinks that kind of behavior is “cute and sweet” probably shouldn’t be allowed out in public themselves.
What I didn’t do was call the Duggar parents “incestuous.” But that seems to be a thing when you start foaming at the mouth...you try to tack on anything you can think of, hoping it will stick.
Your pious and Christlike accusation that I’m trying to compensate for something that happened to me was something you were throwing around on yesterday’s thread. It’s kind of old now. So who’s guilty of, quote, “hurling unsubstantiated accusations in order to get someone to go on the defensive and reveal detail”, unquote? See above and your previous post to me for exact wording. I think you project too much, unlearner.
I don’t know what should happen to Josh Duggar, really. I think there’s every chance he will re-offend, and if and when he does, it will be over for him-—deservedly so. But if you want to go with your frenzied fantasies of crucifixion and castration, who am I to stop you...
Yes, I have referenced some sick stuff, all right...I’ll give you that. It’s what happens when you’re talking about perverts who feel up little children and their creepy,money-grubbing parents who enable them.