Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: i_robot73
‘A’ part? I cite the ‘law’ as a WHOLE; as in WHOLLY unconstitutional. Take your pick on any number of OTHERS as well, it falls within the same.

And I'm sure you have a reasonable, logical legal argument that will demonstrate that, eh?

‘Violate Federal Law’. What DOESN’T these days??

When I was listening to that retard Rand Paul a little bit in clips I've seen on the senate floor, I had noticed that he wasn't talking about what the law actually does, but how the government might violate it. It was a whole bunch of "the government always oversteps! Once it receives power it takes more!" blah blah blah.

But then that got me thinking: If the government has to violate the law in order to abuse it, then what's special about the law? Can't they violate the law even without the Patriot Act?

90 posted on 05/26/2015 10:56:37 AM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
But then that got me thinking

You need a brain to do that.

92 posted on 05/26/2015 10:25:19 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson