To: Polynikes
R U implying a nuclear device or other high explosive device was “tested”. Were that the case that was awfully close to a lightly populated community (Caliente). Not that that ever stopped them in the 1950s with fallout over southern Utah. Just curious as to your thinking.
46 posted on
05/22/2015 4:36:39 PM PDT by
CARTOUCHE
(Professionally trained and licensed BS detector. References on demand.)
To: CARTOUCHE
I won't go so far as saying it was a nuke although one could make that assumption. What I am saying it was a fairly large event that doesn't seem to have standard EQ markers. I drew the tracing from a Utah seismic site that was just over the state border.
The pattern of the event was curious. It seemed atypical for a normal EQ. Remember the Barksdale nukes are not all accounted for.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/missing-nukes-treason-of-the-highest-order/7158
49 posted on
05/22/2015 5:14:12 PM PDT by
Polynikes
(What would Walt Kowalski do. In the meantime "GET OFF MY LAWN")
To: CARTOUCHE; All
See my Comment #68 re 1950s testing.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson