Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

I am not a fan of Buffett, but this is actually a good proposal. It rewards work.

People who receive EITC are working. They may not have a good job, but depending on the size of their family, they could make $20 or more an hour. This also leaves in place a low minimum wage giving young and low skilled workers more potential employment.

The EITC is a reality. It rewards work it also doesn’t punish success as the amount of money given declines as wages increase, so there is no disincentive to try to make lots more money by working longer and harder.


24 posted on 05/22/2015 11:33:09 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jim from C-Town
The EITC is a reality. It rewards work it also doesn’t punish success as the amount of money given declines as wages increase, so there is no disincentive to try to make lots more money by working longer and harder.

The EITC may be a reality, but it subsidizes low paying jobs, which could be construed as a form of "corporate welfare" since companies don't have as much incentive to raise wages to retain good workers.

Also, the EITC does punish success since you can work 40 hours and earn x dollars plus the ETIC for weekly wage Y, or you can work 44 hours and earn x+4 dollars plus EITC-4, for the same total of Y dollars. Where's the incentive to work that extra 4 hours?

The "incentive" doesn't really kick in until you earn too much to qualify for EITC.

28 posted on 05/22/2015 11:50:29 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson