Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shove_it
...until our Beloved Country is reduced to a massive, smoldering Detroit.

Exactly correct. Detroit is the paradigm of where Democrats will ultimately take this country. And if Detroit isn't sufficient proof of the model forecast then one only need to look at almost any major American city in which Democrats have retained their hammerlock control.

And we all know that without Wall Street, New York would have failed long ago. Moreover, the script is being written for where NY is once again headed under Kaiser Wilhelm.

I do not subscribe to the theory that Democrat control over America is a foregone conclusion. Seven million fewer people voted for Obama in 2012 and he would have lost but for a weak candidate who could not bring himself to punch hard. 2016 is different. I sense Americans are eager, yeah spring loaded, to get past the Obama catastrophe and will do so this time without having any unpleasant racial backlash fears. There is a reason there are sop many Republican candidates in 2016, and that is because they all know there is a strong likelihood that a republican will win in 2016. These guys don't all commit to running for president unless there is some empirical evidence (convincing polling) that demonstrates people are sick of Obama/Democrat rule. Oh, sure, some will always get into a presidential race, but this many?? No, there is a clear sense the Democrat rule in the White House is nearing an end.

And Hillary? Please. You tell me how all the college and MTV hipsters are going to come out for tired old, cold Hillary as they did for hip, cool Obama. Ain't gonna happen. And O'Malley? He's running for the VP slot.

17 posted on 05/22/2015 8:07:12 AM PDT by Obadiah (This is Bravo-6, we have Zips in the wire! I repeat, Zips in the wire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Obadiah
I do not subscribe to the theory that Democrat control over America is a foregone conclusion. Seven million fewer people voted for Obama in 2012 and he would have lost but for a weak candidate who could not bring himself to punch hard. 2016 is different.

Obama received the two highest vote totals for President in American history. 69.5 million in 2008 and 66 million in 2008. Romney received 1 million more votes than McCain and still lost by 5 million votes.

Where did you come up with that bogus 7 million fgure?

Here are the facts.

There is a reason there are sop many Republican candidates in 2016, and that is because they all know there is a strong likelihood that a republican will win in 2016.

You and they are delusional. Take a look at the electoral map and tell me what states Hillary will lose that Obama won.


25 posted on 05/22/2015 8:19:40 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah; notdownwidems

There must be a lot of old school Democrats - military vets, small business owners, working people, Christian pro-family/pro-life people, etc. who aren’t with the current extreme left/commie direction of their party - I guess we call them ‘Blue Dogs’ now. These people should be more attracted to the Conservative message we’re trying to promote. We need to have a 2016 candidate who will reach out to these American and bring them in as was done with the Dixiecrats.


39 posted on 05/22/2015 11:23:44 AM PDT by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson