Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pfflier

And it’s only in election season that they report based on likely voters.

That 44% sample I mentioned would have itself been far worse for Hillary if only likely voters had been sampled. IIRC, the lady has had a permanent disapproval rating of about 42% for years.


48 posted on 05/21/2015 10:27:45 AM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
I was wrong in my example. The independents polled at 37% the republicans were at 17%. That means the numbers would have to be even more stacked in favor of the dims to achieve a "majority".

Anyway you have seen through the headline and understand how the polling architecture was skewed on the hildabeast approval poll.

Imagine how many people are just headline readers.

51 posted on 05/21/2015 10:38:58 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson