This website keeps getting nuttier and nuttier. Let me see if I understand this: because the militarized, sniper-police don’t like bikers they set up an ambush, in broad daylight, at a strip mall restaurant, to go on a biker killing spree. And out of 100’s of bikers they only managed to get what? 8 or 9?
wow
And out of 100’s of bikers they only managed to get what? 8 or 9?
Much to the sorrow of certain biker-hating D-Bags on Free Republic.
Interesting. The National Coalition puts out a statement.
1. Local affiliates are dedicated to ... open and peaceful communications between clubs, conflict mediation. WTH do clubs have to have a coalition inorder to promote peaceful communications unless their basic tenant is NON-PEACEFUL?
2. States that the (Cossacks) showed up with over 50 members and started the attack.
(note: The Texas affiliate state chairman and most local chairmen are Bandidos so we have to take the coalition’s statement with a grain of salt.)
A statement from the National Coalition of Motorcyclists said it and its “local affiliates are dedicated to peacefully promoting and protecting constitutional rights, promoting fair treatment of its members by law enforcement, educating its members on current laws, open and peaceful communications between clubs, conflict mediation, and supporting various charitable endeavors. We are grieving.”
The statement claimed the attacks started when “immediately prior to the start of a Texas affiliate’s monthly meeting, a motorcycle club that was NOT a member of the Confederation of Clubs [thought to be the Cossacks] arrived with over 50 people and attacked members of the Confederation.”
” Let me see if I understand this: because the militarized, sniper-police don’t like bikers they set up an ambush”
The National Coalition of Motorcyclists issued a statement that said it was a group of more than 50 (Cossacks) that started the attack.