What on earth do the paired observations of females sharing sexual access to their bodies, and males demonstrating beta behavior towards 1%e'ers, have to do with the discussion at hand? We're talking about the moral depravity of supporting State killing of groups of people and mass arrests on capital charges of virtually all witnesses at the scene.
Women will naturally be aroused by and attracted to dominant players in any field - be it sports, crime, motorcycling, entertainment. Men who fear to attempt their own excellence will be left behind in any arena. Just how life works.
How about this: I don't subserviently defer to outlaw bikers, or cops, or pissed off patriots, or whiny Moms Demanding Less Sociovaginal Sand. Why should I? I treat people with the respect they deserve. And there is a difference between real respect for a human being and his rights, and respect for someone only insofar as their social, class or political views aligns with your own. There is also respect for things that can hurt you. Doesn't mean being afraid. I don't provoke dogs I don't know. I don't tickle my fingers inside tiger cages. I don't rubberband the balls of the bull in the next field. Live a Jackass life, die like a jackass.
The great and eternal truth: Living by principles may mean execution by the temporal power that declares you outlaw. It is called Live Free or Die.
And Death is not the worst of Evils.
If you know anything about 1%ers, then you know that they are criminal organizations, perhaps you only know them from bumping into them, and have never seen behind the curtain, and what they are keeping from you in public, even where I live right now is believed to have come up because the Hells Angels broke in and murdered the guy who owned this place before I did.
Lurid prose, but irrelevant. I know that human beings are fallen animals, and that any organization (whether the Tonton Macoutes or the Vatican) is going to have lesser examples of our race. The people who have issues with "1%'ers" sound, to me, very much like the people who have issues with guns. "It's a phallic object!" "You just fantasize about killing, you gun owners!" "Must be because of a small penis!" (har har, #elbow).
Yeah, it's just like being sad and butthurt and anxiously detesticled when a really hot girl that you Want To Have A Beautiful Relationship With actually prefers to crudely spike herself on the guy who speaks plainly, rides a thundering engine and puts her in a state of excited fear before he takes her into a private clubhouse where he and his brothers don't allow the public....
We all know the picture I am painting. That's what I pick up from your posts. And based on experience (and history as well for those who read it) the private bedroom fetishes and anxious mental self flagellations of the tyrant are usually all about this kind of rejected emasculation. Hitler had his failed artiste period in Vienna; Mao ended up starving millions while he kept himself supplied with a steady stream of virgins; we have the Islamic State with their naked dhimmi slave market.
I'll throw a challenge out here to folks. I'd bet that the majority of those who support this bloody mass execution of citizens expressing their First Amendment rights - and then the immediate charging of capital crimes against over eight score witnesses - is a pretty damn 1:1 match for those who secretly would just love to go shopping at Pretty Yazidi Market in Raqqa if they could.
Because, like they always say - rape is not about sex, it's about power. Fantasies are about power too, including the negative ones. When I see fellow citizens espousing things that clearly demonstrate infection with the bloody abrogation of the Constitution - I am filled with disgust. That is how I understand Samuel Adams.
May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen
In none of my posts have you seen me say anything in support of the police or the shootings, or anything else about the incident, so you are obviously confused, and misposting.
Then let's make certain. What is your Constitutional take on these shootings? I see grave and disturbing escalation on the point of the Leviathan.
Share your take.
Do you realize how confused you are about who you are posting to? I tried to tell you that you should go find someone who is blindly supporting the cops to make your speeches to, search my posts, you won’t find any of that from me, so why are you pestering me with your nonsense?
If you are not on a discussion board to discuss, but rather agree, then I won't disturb you.
You really got off track, just as I told you in post 298.
OK buddy.