You cannot pick out a single paragraph and go AHA m point is proved. It is not. The law of the land is that abortion is legal. You can hate that all you want butyour paragraph quotation does NOTHING to change the overall ruling
Nonsense. And I didn't pick out a single paragraph from some unnamed source, YOU DID. I posted a passage of the ACTUAL DECISION issued in Roe where it clearly states that the case for abortion COLLAPSES with the establishment of personhood.
You either believe that a baby is a person or you don't. Which do you believe? Do you believe that the baby might develop into something other than a person, and if so what? Does the mother have a giraffe inside of here, because in that case she certainly has every right to remove it. What she DOES NOT have is the right to kill another person.
The law of the land is that abortion is legal.
First of all, the Supreme Court DOES NOT and NEVER HAS been empowered to make law, there is simply no foundation for believing otherwise.
Secondly, murder of a person has NEVER been legal anywhere in the United States.
You can hate that all you want butyour paragraph quotation does NOTHING to change the overall ruling
The ruling is just that, it is a ruling that says abortion is fine as long as what is being aborted isn't a person; otherwise, it is illegal. The fact that nearly all, including the vast majority of those who claim to be pro-life, have misinterpreted, and subsequently miscodified, the ruling doesn't change the facts.
I must say that I find your defense of Roe somewhat troubling. You seem to be going out of your way to justify it as somehow being lawful.