Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tbw2
So, think a few steps forward: the men are then going to turn away from entire generations of sterile women and high-quality virtual-reality Oculus-porn, and decide instead to become married, monogamous and responsible, and have what they always wanted: kids to support?

Because men have to get married if there's going to be a responsible marriage-and-family culture.

Why would they?

Your solution (lots, lots, lots more Norplant and IUD's) only contributes to the further disintegration and decay of anything even vaguely resembling a human culture --- as opposed to what you'll find in the oozy bottom of a never-cleaned garbage can.

53 posted on 05/19/2015 11:08:08 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When I grow up, I'm gonna settle down, chew honeycomb & drive a tractor, grow things in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Subsidizing the broken families (and those who are on welfare are almost never married) does not help society.

Ending the subsidies for more fatherless children will incentivize proper family formation, even if it simply means curtailing the growth of a socially broken underclass so that married women have a lower financial burden and can afford more children.


56 posted on 05/19/2015 11:28:24 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson