You said you were an eyewitness:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3291368/posts?page=125#125
To: Brown Deer
Only an Obot and Orly Taitz would dismiss an eyewitness account as a lack of evidence.
125 posted on Sun Jun 07 2015 09:40:25 GMT-0500 (CDT) by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citifzen) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
You are in a better position to do what you suggest I and other freepers do (post #117)
Eyewitness testimony is better than second hand information, which is what is being posted on the internet.
Link to #117
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3291368/posts?page=117#117
A complaint was filed in the US District Court alleging Obama was born on Aug 4, 1961 in Hawaii, issued a CLN in 1968 while residing in Indonesia, returned to the US in 1971 to live as a permanent resident alien in the US until 1983 when he naturalized as a US citizen.
The court considered the allegations in the complaint as true and then dismissed the case as frivilous on a motion by the US government before allowing discovery to begin. An Appointments Clause challenge was raised in a timely manner to challenge the authority of appointees of Obama moving the court to dismiss the case before a challenge to America’s sovereignty could be addressed by the court. A new precedent has been set. Appointments Clause challenges are addressed by the court unless the complainant can prove the President is ineligible.
And no, I’m not going to give you the case number because I’ve already been the victim of ID theft and I don’t want to compound the problem.