Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman
I did read that the gentleman is or has gotten his money back.

True.

But there are countless similar cases.

The point being that the feds consider not violating the law as suspicious behavior and an unlawful act.

It's as if you were arrested for driving 59 MPH on a road with a 60 MPH speed limit and charged with intentionally driving under the limit for the purpose of evading the fine for speeding.

Or being arrested for throwing your trash in a garbage can for the purpose of evading the fine for littering.


14 posted on 05/17/2015 8:19:13 AM PDT by Iron Munro (We may be paranoid but that doesn't mean they aren't really after us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Iron Munro

USA v Raich ruled the feds could do a dynamic raid and seizure of state-legal homegrown goods because it reduced demand for illegal interstate commerce.


21 posted on 05/17/2015 8:55:01 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Hillary:polarizing/calculating/disingenuous/insincere/ambitious/inevitable/entitled/overconfident/se)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson