To: driftless2
One of the "positive" benefits of MJ according to its proponents is that, unlike alcohol, it tends to relax users and make them less aggressive. [...] If MJ has a calming effect, why didn't it calm the black males killed in the recent high profile incidents? [emphasis added]
Which part of "tends" did you not understand?
What part of it might tend to make some people more aggressive do you understand?
I understand that it's the first time you've made that statement; I also understand that even if true it doesn't contradict the population-wide generalization that pot "tends to relax users and make them less aggressive."
51 posted on
05/19/2015 7:55:43 AM PDT by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
I understand that it's the first time you've made that statement; I also understand that even if true it doesn't contradict the population-wide generalization that pot "tends to relax users and make them less aggressive." It works the same way for gun control. Being armed tends to make you safer, but for a gun control proponent one instance of someone having their own gun used against them will trump all other evidence.
54 posted on
05/19/2015 8:03:04 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: ConservingFreedom
Maybe it does...I’ve never used the drug first-hand. I’m a pretty calm person. My contention is that maybe MJ calms some groups and not others.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson