Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This could be Hugh.
1 posted on 05/16/2015 8:44:39 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

and Series and Hillaryous could be a major problem for her campaign.


2 posted on 05/16/2015 8:46:08 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

They’re no more corrupt than she is.


3 posted on 05/16/2015 8:50:44 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The Rodham Boys?





4 posted on 05/16/2015 8:50:46 AM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

No problem.

The only potential Hillary voters to exist on Planet Earth are so addled, and so enamoured of corruption and abuse of power, they’d vote for her even if her brothers were serving time.


5 posted on 05/16/2015 8:51:19 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Move them to a tin shack in Kenya. Problem solved.


6 posted on 05/16/2015 8:51:51 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Now that I know how much access the Clinton Foundation has bought in the media (they give $20K and get $100K in access) I have little hope of her losing both the nomination and the election. Makes me sad.


8 posted on 05/16/2015 9:04:10 AM PDT by Mercat (Release the HildeKraken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Wishful thinking.

The Clintons have no “embarrassment threshold”.
There is no way to shame them.

No matter how low and disgusting an accusation, the truth about them is always lower and more disgusting.

And the press will always side with them and cover for them against any republican or conservative.


9 posted on 05/16/2015 9:10:06 AM PDT by Iron Munro (We may be paranoid but that doesn't mean they aren't really after us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Nah. The bros will be an asset for anyone considering voting for her!


11 posted on 05/16/2015 9:23:06 AM PDT by PeachyKeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

We don’t need her brothers to bring her down. She’s done enough by herself.


12 posted on 05/16/2015 9:28:32 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Nope the MSM has a cover story for everything she did like the did for Obama hell she won’t even answer questions and the MSM gives her a pass.


13 posted on 05/16/2015 9:38:58 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
This could be Hugh.

Yes. But isn't Tony also involved?

14 posted on 05/16/2015 9:56:49 AM PDT by upchuck (The current Federal Government is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Wasn’t Tony Rodham married to Barbara Boxer’s daughter? A mention of child support in this article. Is he divorced?


15 posted on 05/16/2015 10:27:06 AM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson