Posted on 05/13/2015 4:26:56 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Ah, yes, another “common-sense” bill that is anything but. BTT
This is clearly racist. The same rules should apply for voting.
Yeah, I like that. Face to face. Like some store clerk can tell if someone is psycho? If they’re legally allowed to purchase ammo in their state then what’s the problem?
Like most women and liberals, if I’m not being redundant, she’s afraid of guns. It’s as simple as that.
Rep. Donald Payne, D-N.J., calls it “common-sense reform.”
They want us disarmed.
Common sense tells me that’s not good.
Why not require a face-to-face purchase of a TV?
or a computer?
Or a tablecloth?
In fact, why not ban any internet purchasing in America!!
OH WAIT....
“Common Sense” is fun.... because it is in the “Eye of the Beholder” that defines it.
Likely she fears anything hard that points and fires a projectile(s)
My wife bought our boy a Sub2000 today
She digs all that
See the difference right
How about we require all Senators and Congressmen go face to face with all of the hookers they hire for tax purposes. Then make them report them on their returns as paying Social Security for their “employees”.
F the Rat
“Electronic” voting — let’s ban that FIRST.
And bring a freaking picture ID to the voting booth!
Report any purchase of over 1000 rounds within a five day period to the Department of Justice?
Do they intend to hire Indonesia to answer the phones calls?
This is another 17th Amendment-related issue imo. More on this shortly.
Regardless what FDR’s thug justices wanted everybody to believe about the scope of Congress's Commerce Clause powers when it wrongly decided Wickard v. Filburn in Congress’s favor in 1942 imo, FDR’s activist justices wrongly ignored that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate commerce.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
The reason that this bill is related to 17A is this. If 17A had not been ratified then I think that senators would do their duty to protect their respective states by killing the referenced bill.
Unfortunately, it is now at least possible, don’t know about probable, that the corrupt Senate could pass this bill.
The 17th Amendment needs to disappear, and a bunch of corrupt senators along with it.
They make all kinds of laws restricting us and freeing themselves.
I love it. :)
Hmmmmm, yeah, restricting ammo purchases to 73,000 rounds/year (from each WalMart), that's going to stop bat**** crazy mass killers.
This obviously will never see the light of day. Gun control must be a big part of Her Thighness' campaign platform
She not afraid of guns, she’s afraid of the people who own guns. Because they believe in freedom and the right to defend themselves against a despotic government.
A thousand rounds? That would be the equivalent of banks reporting ATM withdrawals of more than $500 in a week.
When they sell those cases of .223 or 7.62 at a great price & include free shipping with no sales tax, lot people scarf them up. And then it’s fun time at the range.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.