Haha! Noted that you still refuse to answer a simple question, huh? Insist on deflecting and using the tired liberal accusations. Save the Ben Matlock fantasy, this isn’t a court of law. It’s the NFL. There is a world of difference between doing what’s “right” and doing what’s “legal”. Yes, the physical evidence is sketchy at best. But You don’t have to be Frank Columbo to figure out what’s going on. Do you also think Hillary should be left alone because we don’t have the 30,000 emails she deleted? Let me guess, you have no opinion on that because there’s no evidence to suggest she did anything wrong, correct? ;-)
Too funny. Good luck convincing someone of THAT!
You obviously can not read the English language. My answer, stated a number of times, is they did not prove cheating. My ‘feelings’ are immaterial, as are my suspicions...that’s your bag. I’m not a liberal, but you sure think like one. I would not convict anyone based on the so called evidence in the report. And comparing deflated footballs to Hillary Clinton is a real hoot. Why not compare this to the Holocaust while you’re spewing silly hyperboles. So how much did you lose betting on Indy, or was it the Seahawks? On appeal the 4 game suspension will be voided...my prediction. What’s yours?
the investigator says there was direct evidence.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/direct-evidence-shows-tom-brady-knew-about-deflated-footballs-nfl-investigator-says/