Yay!!!
Posted on 05/08/2015 7:14:48 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Well, with so much proof, who can argue?
What we can actually prove, is that the climate has been warming continuously since the end of the last ice age. It will likely continue until the start of the next ice age. Mankind neither started the current warming, now will stop the current warming. We are not God, as much as extremists may like to imagine themselves to be.
I think Obama's reason wanting open borders is that he wants to saturate the country with democrat voters and Muslims to completely change the country. I think Republicans only want more cheap labor and consumers for the sake of all business in the country.
The latter scares me much less.
One litmus test only.
Do you swear you will only serve one term? Anything after one term and you become part of the establishment as it is now a full time job.
Where is your evidence Chris?
Better yet, what are your motives for pushing this hoax?
Population Control?
Undermining Capitalism?
Destroying the best chance the 3rd world has for escaping poverty?
I reject most of your assertions.
CO2 is a LAGGING indicator, NOT a predictor of temperature.
Water vapor comprises over 93% of “greenhouse gases” and there are so many variables driving the fluctuation of water vapor in the atmosphere, that it’s impossible to model.
This makes the process for assessing the impact of CO2 on climate virtually impossible.
The first thing we must recognize is that this hoax was concocted as a political mechanism to grab power and control.
Its about Population Control, undermining Capitalism and American Industry.
Especially in the head.
“I reject most of your assertions.”
Please address which assertions that you reject!
That’s my take, so let’s just assume for the sake of argument that there is global warming and it is due to man, so what? Why are the changes that supposedly it brings about bad? Sure some will be negatively impacted but how do we know that it won’t bring about potential positives like creating more arable farmland?
For most Americans, I think the clincher was China surpassing us. If they're not doing anything about it we shouldn't either.
I left off one other factor, the hypocrisy of the warmists. They're flying around, staying in four star hotels and getting shuffled around in limos while telling us to cut our consumption.
With the alleged demise of communism (actually the communists simply renamed themselves “progressives” and came here (where most — but not ALL — of them became “democrats”) and elsewhere in Europe and the world), the left needed another “Boogieman” with which frighten the masses so they could be more easily herded into their lusted for and unattainable pseudo-egalitarian and Utopian “New World Order” (where some are “more equal than others”, thank you Mr. Orwell!).
Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) now “Climate Change” drew the short straw!
Well it would be the one I cited!!!
CO2 is a LAGGING indicator, NOT a predictor of temperature.
“Well it would be the one I cited!!! CO2 is a LAGGING indicator, NOT a predictor of temperature.”
Only that is not what he cited. Please quote from his post that which you reject.
Oh, I see ......it’s english and science you have trouble understanding..
“Both sides believe adding CO2 to the atmosphere, all other things being equal, would raise temperatures.”
“Deniers” believe that the forcing has been overstated. It’s either smaller, neutral, or possibly negative i.e. the Earth dampens the warming.”
And my statement:
“CO2 is a LAGGING indicator, NOT a predictor of temperature.”
So, his first statement is that “adding CO2...would raise temperatures”
Since the increase in CO2 is LAGGING temperature rises, it can NOT be cited as a “cause”.
The same applies to the statement about “forcing”.
If it LAGS, it can NOT be a “forcing” function.
“So, his first statement is that “adding CO2...would raise temperatures” Since the increase in CO2 is LAGGING temperature rises, it can NOT be cited as a “cause”.”
Oh, I see ......it’s english and science you have trouble understanding..
He said “all other things being equal”. In that case there would be no source of CO2 to come out of solution due to temperature increases.
“If it LAGS, it can NOT be a “forcing” function”
We all know that voltage is the forcing function in an electrical circuit.
I am sure you have heard that voltage lags current in a capacitive circuit ...
You’ll have plenty of time to talk about this in the federal pen, Krispy Kream.
Why am I suddenly reminded of the supposed contribution of cow flatulence to global warming? Hmmm...
No, you don’t get that one.
The “all other things being equal” has NO EFFECT on the underlying statement, which asserts that CO2 causes temp increase.
There is NO evidence of any such cause and effect.
you don’t get this one either.
The atmosphere is NOT an electrical circuit.
CO2 is NOT a “forcing function” for climate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.