Perhaps, perhaps not — the fact is that both voted YES
to ignoring the Constitution's sue process regarding the adoption of treaties.
In light of that, I find myself disinterested in motive and intent — everyone there swore to uphold and defend the Constitution and everyone there, with the exception of Mr. Cotton, failed it with their assent of this.
I’ve already written several times why it is of benefit to vote YES on the Bill.
And why should a senator be barred from further proceedings if he voted NAY
?
Where is your commentary on McConnell? Is he a paragon of virtue in your world? Why are you not focused on him?
I covered him in November and December — ultimately I view him (and Boehner) as proof that the vote the lesser of two evils
crowd is full of shit: there was little chance that he (or Boehner) would have been better than a brand-new Democrat, but they won their districts despite this... and now the rest of us have been privileged to be pissed on by them and being told it's rain.
Besides that, nobody's pushing the idea that McConnel is a good guy and our hope for restoring the republic.
Ted Cruz is a good guy and our hope for restoring the republic.